Home Blog Page 979

Lessons in gluttony and kimchi – ins and outs of Korean BBQ

All You Can Eat Korean Barbeque, otherwise known as A.Y.C.E., has become popular amongst non-Koreans for its indulgent, interactive food experience. The idea, nonexistent in Korea, combines the American love for unlimited food and savory meat with traditional Korean dipping sauces and side dishes (called banchan). For many people, this is a match made in heaven.

Upon entering A.Y.C.E. restaurants, an unmistakable aroma of meat wafts through the air. Usually busy during dinner hours, servers bring out as many platters of raw meat as the table can handle. When the meat arrives, the diners cook it themselves at their own pace. There are no limits to how many times one can order; however, most restaurants will charge an additional fee if there is an excessive amount of leftover meat.

Once a party is satisfied with the first course, the server then brings out an assortment of side dishes and salad. The salad usually has a slightly sweet and vinegary taste to it, which compliments the meat quite nicely. Out of the side dishes, the most popular is kimchi, which goes well with the meat and rice and dduk bosam (rice paper). The rice paper is used as a wrap for meat, along with the salad, garlic, kimchi or anything else one wants. Most restaurants also serve steamed eggs, doenjang jjigae (traditional Korean soybean paste stew) and scallion pancakes. These add variety to the incoming waves of meat.

When it is time to order, the possibilities are endless. Customers are allowed to choose from various sets; the more expensive the set is, the more choices of meat it entails. A popular choice is the chadohl (beef brisket). It is very thin, cooks quickly and goes well with ganjang (Korean soy sauce). Other delectable choices that are popular amongst both Koreans and non-Koreans are samgyupsal (Korean bacon), yangnyum galbi (marinated beef ribs) and bulgogi (marinated beef). The samgyupsal goes well with the ssamjang (red chili paste) or gireumjang (sesame oil and salt). Both the yangnyum galbi and bulgogi are marinated, so there is no need to dip them in anything. If diners are feeling more adventurous, they can try dishes like Gopchang (grilled intestines) which are popular amongst Koreans. While the concept of eating intestines may sound unappealing to most Americans, those who dare to try it will be rewarded.

With the plethora of A.Y.C.E. restaurants occupying Koreatown, finding the right spot can be overwhelming. Many frequent Korean BBQ goers have found Hae Jang Chon, Oh Dae San, Road to Seoul and Moo Dae Po 2 to be great spots. If they are looking for a place that specializes in pork, Don Day is a good option. While Park’s BBQ, Honey Pig and 8 Cut may not be all-you-can-eat, they are quality restaurants and are worth visiting.

Koreatown is located in central Los Angeles, near W. 8th Street and Eastern Avenue. Hours will vary depending on the restaurant.


Loading

Hannibal Season 2, Episode 1 review: A delicious appetizer

(Warning: this review contains spoilers for “Hannibal” Season 1.)

“Hannibal” comes out swinging. Literally.

“Kaiseki” – the first episode of critical darling “Hannibal’s” second season – opens with a grisly flash forward: A fight to the death between two major characters that completely reshuffles the deck. It’s an interesting attempt at fixing what I imagine will be the show’s biggest problem going forward: namely, the inevitability of Will Graham and his relationship with the eponymous cannibalistic serial killer Hannibal Lecter. Although “Kaiseki” doesn’t quite lean on the pressure valve as much as it should, it releases just enough steam to re-engage its audience.

The story of Hannibal Lecter is almost public knowledge. Even if you haven’t seen any of the films or read the books, you know about the lambs, Clarice and that part where he does the thing with his tongue. Unlike “Bates Motel” – the other serial killer prequel show currently running – “Hannibal” doesn’t seek to explain the origins of Lecter’s madness. Partially because “Hannibal’s” titular character (Mads Mikkelsen) isn’t quite in line with Anthony Hopkins’ famous portrayal, but also because the show is explicitly not a Hannibal Lecter origin story.

The man-eating psychiatrist is already well along in his serial killing by the time the audience joins him. Instead, the show focuses on Hannibal’s almost codependent relationship with FBI consultant Will Graham (Hugh Dancy). Will is afflicted with the polar opposite of Asperger’s syndrome: His psychological issues lie in the realm of hyper-sensitivity, not a sociopathic lack of empathy. This makes him an ideal tool for FBI Agent Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne), who – as is often the case with shows like these – is often stumped by a particularly horrible case.

This could make for a fairly benign show, if executed poorly. Every new episode would have an increasingly disturbing murder, Hannibal & Will show up at the crime scene, Will tries to solve the murder, Hannibal messes around with him, they catch the crazy person and every 15 minutes somebody looks at the camera and says “Hannibal Lecter is a serial killer who eats people.” Repeat for 13 episodes until cancellation.

And there was some of that early on, but the first season was saved by three aspects. First, the show’s aesthetic is both haunting and gripping, with a deep color palette and a fearless love of gore. Second, “Hannibal” begun to fully utilize its premise fairly quickly, becoming more of a serialized drama than a series of unconnected murders. And third, the relationship between Will and Hannibal is genuinely compelling. Hannibal is clearly toying with his “friend,” but it never seems to come from a place of malice. For all his flaws (murdering people), Hannibal is still a scientist. He finds Will’s mind a curiosity, so he pokes and prods at Will until something happens.

That “something” turns out to be framing Will for all of Hannibal’s murders, which understandably puts Will and Hannibal at odds. This is where “Kaiseki” opens with Hannibal assisting the FBI in Will’s stead, while poor Will is locked in a psychiatric hospital. Thankfully, the first season’s momentum continues into season two, with the killer of the week currently more of a backdrop to the interplay between the characters.

“Hannibal” clearly wants to keep topping itself in terms of horrific imagery, and it succeeds. I almost had to pause the episode at one point, which is a rare occurrence when it comes to media. If you can’t handle gore, perhaps this is not the show for you. Thankfully, all this carnage does not come at the expense of the story.

I mentioned earlier that “Hannibal’s” biggest hurdle is the knowledge of how this ride ends. The show hasn’t quite dropped its obnoxious habit of winking at the audience. At one point, Hannibal is eating with a fellow psychiatrist and sarcastically quips, “Well, I guess you’re dining with a psychopathic murderer,” and literally smirks at the camera.

This kind of thing is too cheeky for its own good, and has a nasty tendency to completely rip me out of the episode.

Overall, “Kaiseki” is a fairly strong opener. I said in my “Kill la Kill” review that a good episodic story balanced character/plot advancement with leaving just enough open to tantalize the audience, and Hannibal finally grasped this technique around the end of Season 1, taking those lessons into Season 2.

Much like early Best Picture-frontrunner, “The Lego Movie,” “Hannibal” is much better than it has any right to be. It’s still an engaging, unforgettably grisly show, but I can’t help but feel like it could maybe speed everything up just a bit.

Mike Cosimano is a first-year psychology major. He can be reached at cosimanowhite@oxy.edu or on Twitter @WklyMCosimano.


Loading

Underwhelmed at the Oscars

The Academy Awards rolled into town this past Sunday, bringing with them a flurry of chiffon, satin and sequins. The Academy Awards is infamous for its red carpet, where celebrities reign over normal humans in their high heels and expertly tailored tuxedos. Next to the biannual fashion weeks held worldwide, the Oscar Red Carpet is one of the most important and influential fashion events of the year.

Unfortunately, this year’s red carpet wasn’t all that incredible. Few women floated down the red carpet in gowns worthy of royalty; several men looked positively absurd. Where is the Old Hollywood glamour that I know and love? The red carpet arrivals are the only reason I watch the show to begin with, considering the actual awards must be rigged if they keep on denying my beloved Leonardo DiCaprio of his golden statue.

So, without further ado, let us discuss the best and worst dressed of the 2014 Academy Awards.

The couples
Winner of Best Actor, Matthew McConaughey and his wife Camilla Alves both looked lovely. Though I can hardly believe the same man who starred in “Fools Gold” and “How To Lose A Guy in 10 Days” is an Oscar winner, he certainly looked the part in his black pants and white dinner jacket. Alves was covered from neck-to-toe in baby pink fabric that was elegant and unexpected on the usually skin-baring model.

Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie looked predictably gorgeous in a classic black suit for him and Elie Saab for her. I adore Jewish master-designer Saab, and Jolie definitely looked quite pretty, but I would have preferred a little more color on the mother of six.

Pharrell Williams and girlfriend Helen Lasichanh were easily the worst dressed couple of the night. Williams looked fine from the waist up, in a black dress coat, cleanly pressed white button-down and sharp black bow tie. The slim-fitting black dress shorts that he chose over full-length dress pants was the problem. This is the Academy Awards! Why on earth would you wear shorts to a formal, black-tie awards show? Lasichanh managed to get full length pants on, but still looked foolish in her wannabe-formal suit that fit awkwardly and didn’t flatter at all. Couples should rarely, if ever, try to match each other on the red carpet. Remember that time Justin Timberlake and Britney Spears wore His and Hers Denim in the form of tuxedo and gown? It was bad, just like this duo’s looks.

The men
Jared Leto could have been okay with his black and white tuxedo. His red bow-tie was even a nice touch. But that hair. It is ombre and longer than mine, looks drier than sand paper and is just not working. Who is letting you grow out your hair, Jared? Why didn’t they get you a hot-oil treatment before you went to pick up your Best Supporting Actor award?

Leonardo DiCaprio continues to make hearts flutter in a navy tuxedo with swept back hair and handsome scruff along his chin. He even added a crisp white pocket square to his suit, just as a leading man should. With his mother on his arm in a gold dress, he was undeniably perfect.

British import Benedict Cumberbatch tied with DiCaprio for best dressed male. His black suit fit exceptionally well, his shoes gleamed and his reddish-brown hair flopped youthfully on his head.

The women
Best Supporting Actress, Lupita Nyong’o, was my favorite of the entire night. Her skin was luminous, her diamond tiara was precious and the light-blue Prada gown she selected was stunning. She was the princess of the Academy Awards.

Runner-up for best dressed female goes to Kate Hudson. She wore a silky, white, gloriously draped Atelier Versace dress that featured a train and a cape. Her golden hair was styled into soft waves and smoky eye makeup completed this look.

Jennifer Lawrence wore red Christian Dior with a fiery little peplum and looked radiant. Her hairstyle aged her, but her makeup and reverse necklace was just right. However, somebody definitely needs to teach her how to walk in long dresses; she took a tumble once again this year, only this time not while walking up for an award. She is only 23 years old, after all.

Best Actress winner Cate Blanchett was pretty and pale in Giorgio Armani dress embellished with flowers and sequins. The shape of the dress was lovely, but what about some color? Even her make up was colorless. On a woman who is so fair skinned, a little contrast in the form of an jewel toned dress can go a long way.

However, the absolute worst of the evening was Anna Kendrick. The young actress wore a disjointed dress by J. Mendel that had unfortunate illusion mesh cutouts, an awkward knee high slit and an ugly red and black floral beaded section at the waist. Her hair looked greasy and her makeup was not the right colors. The back of the dress was quite interesting, mostly because it didn’t fit at all with what was going on in front. Most offensive was when Kendrick tried to pop her leg out of the slit like Jolie did two years ago and ended up looking very uncomfortable.

Everyone else who attended the show mostly played it safe, which was just so boring. A little more fun but also more fashion failures came from dresses and suits worn during the after-parties. Next year, I recommend all nominees come find me – I’ll happily help them up the ante in a chic way.

Noel Hemphill is a junior ECLS major. She can be reached at hemphill@oxy.edu or on Twitter @WklyNHemphill.

Loading

Jeremy Childs

Jeremy Childs is a senior English and Comparative Literary Studies major from Newbury Park, Calif. He began working for the Weekly in September 2013 and enjoys writing about music and news on campus.

@WeeklyJeremy

Loading

Donovan Dennis

Donovan P. Dennis is a junior Geology/History major from Great Falls, Mont., celebrating his third year with the Weekly as Communications Director. When he is not tweeting/writing op-eds about the college, he enjoys visiting museums, drinking cold coffee, and using his rock polisher. Donovan is also a member of the Men’s Swim and Dive team, for which he competes in the IM and Breaststroke events.

Loading

Chloe Woodruff

Loading

Manna Selassie

Loading

Michael Tonetti

Michael J. Tonetti is a junior DWA major/Economics and Math Minor from Las Vegas, Nev. who has been with the Weekly for almost a year. Besides writing for the paper, Michael plays on the men’s soccer team and is a member of the Student-Alumni Relations Committee. In his free time, Michael likes to play (bass) guitar and read transgressive fiction. He will be studying abroad in Valparaiso, Chile during the Spring 2015 semester.

@WklyMTonetti

Loading

Jack Butcher

Loading

Malcolm MacLeod

Malcolm MacLeod is a Junior AHVA major with minors in Interdisciplinary Writing and Studio Art. He has been writing at the Weekly for three semesters, and as a Senior writer this year, he hopes to delve deeper into student life at Occidental, particularly the arts community. A summer internship at KPCC radio in Pasadena affirmed Malcolm’s already strong interest in journalism, and has inspired him to explore the potential of various media as journalistic tools. Malcolm also plays defensive end on the Occidental football team.
@WklyMMacLeod

Loading